| ✓ | Independent CRO audits and testing — runs audits, test plans and readouts personally, start to finish. |
| ✓ | Adobe Target — split tests and personalization. |
| ✓ | GA4 and Google Tag Manager — sets up the tracking a test is judged on, and checks it fires before launch. |
| ✓ | Reporting to stakeholders — one page per test: what changed, the numbers, keep or kill. |
| ✓ | Ecommerce and lead-gen tactics — bundles, offers, forms, cart and form drop-off. |
Five years in-house as the traffic and conversion owner for a consumer brand, until the company sold. I ran the paid traffic, almost all Google and Meta, and the product messaging it landed on. Acquisition cost was over half of revenue. The biggest win wasn't a button color: we repositioned each main product around who it was for ("if you're X, this is for you; if you're Y, here's the one for you"). Acquisition cost fell to 18% of revenue.
Using Test 1 below (hold the pop-up): I build the A/B activity in Target myself — audience, the two experiences, and the goal metric (Amazon clicks per visit, with Attribution sales as the second check). Before launch I QA every experience on desktop and phone with Target's QA links and confirm the goal fires in the analytics. A developer is needed only if the pop-up is hard-coded in the theme. Then it runs to a sample size set in advance, never stopped early on a good day, and the readout goes out in plain words.
I start with the scoreboard, not the pages: is every lead counted once, tied to its source, and does a "lead" on the site match a lead in sales? Then I read the last six months of tests. If tracking is sound and tests ran to full sample, I refine. If not, I fix measurement first. Month one: about 10 hours on the audit, 10 on a ranked roadmap of the 2–3 pages with the most traffic and biggest drop-off, and the rest launching the first test.
A store owner's Meta account showed about 40% more purchases than his store had. What I told him: "Facebook is counting some of your sales twice, so the ads look better than they are." The cause was an old pixel left over from a migration. I recommended removing it before touching any budget. He worried the drop would look like the ads got worse overnight, so I showed both counts side by side for a week first. After the fix, Meta matched the store.
The buy button starts about 800px down, under 12 flavor buttons and a cookie bar.
No pop-up on load. The email ask moves to exit intent or after the Amazon click, with a reason to give it.
| # | Test | Why it should win | Scored on |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hold the pop-up until exit intent or after the Amazon click | The first thing a shopper sees is a box asking for something, before the price. | Amazon clicks per visit |
| 2 | "Buy on Amazon" above the flavor grid; flavors collapsed to 3 + "more" | The button is below the fold on a laptop. | Amazon clicks per visit |
| 3 | "About $2.08 a can" next to $24.99 | People price energy drinks by the can. | Amazon sales (Attribution) |
| 4 | Amazon stars and review count by the button | The proof exists on Amazon; the shopper can't see it here. | Amazon sales (Attribution) |
The Amazon links already carry Amazon Attribution tags (maas), so each test is scored on real Amazon sales, not just clicks. A version with more clicks and fewer sales loses.
For a quote-request or service-call form, the first three tests I'd look at:
Every one is judged on what sales counts as a lead, not on what the form counts.
| Week 1 | Tracking check: every lead counted once and matched to its source and to sales. |
| Week 2 | Review of past tests; ranked list of the 2–3 pages with the most traffic and drop-off. |
| Week 3 | First test built and QA'd in Adobe Target. |
| Week 4 | Test live; one-page readout format agreed with the account team. |
Built from a public look at zoaenergy.com on Nov 5, 2026. Prepared by Joe Smith.